Open Access Humanitarian Scholarship
Time to first decision
Volume: 1 Issue: 3
Year: 2025, Page: 240-251,
Received: Sept. 10, 2025 Accepted: Oct. 14, 2025 Published: Dec. 26, 2025
The rapid expansion of digital technologies has profoundly reconfigured educational ecosystems, with particularly significant implications for English language education among engineering students in Hyderabad. Digital platforms, artificial intelligence–enabled applications, mobile learning tools, and virtual classrooms have altered pedagogical practices, promising enhanced accessibility, personalization, and transnational communicative engagement. Yet these promises remain unevenly realized, as digital transformation continues to reproduce structural inequalities rather than uniformly mitigating them. Even within an urban and technologically advanced context such as Hyderabad, engineering students from marginalized socio-economic backgrounds and disability-affected communities encounter persistent barriers to access, participation, and meaningful engagement with digital learning environments. Positioned within critical perspectives on digital pedagogy, this paper examines digital inclusivity in English language education by advancing the argument that inclusion must be conceptualized not merely as access to technology but as the cultivation of learner agency. Employing a mixed-methods research design that combines a systematic literature review, surveys, case studies, semi-structured interviews, and pilot pedagogical interventions, the study identifies key structural and pedagogical constraints while evaluating inclusive digital practices. The findings demonstrate that while digital technologies hold substantial transformative potential, inclusive outcomes are contingent upon robust infrastructure, teacher preparedness, collaborative stakeholder engagement, and sustained policy support.
Keywords: Digital inclusivity, English language education, digital divide, accessibility, adaptive learning, educational technology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge.
CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dreamson, N. (2019). Critical understandings of digital technology in education: Meta-connective pedagogy. Routledge.
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Using mobile technology to develop language skills. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 1–17.
Heitink, M. C., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Verplanken, L., & van Braak, J. (2016). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 555–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9439-8
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. Routledge.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
Lim, C. P., & Wang, L. (2022). Blended learning and inclusivity. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 945–960. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13204
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2022). TPACK revisited: Examining the evolution of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 1–20.
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. ASCD.
Seale, J. (2014). E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility research and practice. Routledge.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Academic.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Preparing teachers for technology integration in education. Computers & Education, 104, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.001
UNESCO. (2020). Education in a post-COVID world: Nine ideas for public action. UNESCO.
van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
World Bank. (2021). Digital learning and education for all. World Bank.
© 2025 JDR Academic Trust. This is an open-access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Ali, M., & Sharma, V. (2025). From access to agency: Digital inclusivity in contemporary English language education. Journal of Discourse Review, 1(3), 240–251.